Show TagsAdrian Newey Amateur Arnold Newman Art Artistry Boudoir Business Camera change Chicago Clients Collaboration Comfort Levels Criticism Critique Crop David Lynch dinosaurs Domaschuk editing Facebook Fine Art Future Giulio Sciorio Hicaro History hybrid photography inspiration iPhone Like Meetup Nudity obsolete Photography Photoshop Podcasting post production Printing Professional Social Media style Techniques Ted Forbes Twitter Video
Our Personal Blogs
Friends of the Show
Category Archives: Podcast
Think about it. Are you jaded or hopeful? Do you find photography these days something to be excited about or something that hasn’t yanked your crank for decades? Is modern photography something you love or was the last great photographer Ansel Adams?
The question we asked ourselves tonight was. “when was the last time you were excited about photography?” And we mean really excited?
After talking about it for a few minutes, all three of us came up with something that we find excited us and that was a hell of a relief.
Let us know in the comments: what was the last thing that really excited you about photography? We’re all curious here about your opinion!
Yeah, it finally happened: after two and a half years of the show, we ran into some audio issues. The sound gets a bit rough at times but today’s content is great!
So anyway, another camera store bites the bullet and this time it’s Chicago-based Calumet; a national chain used by professional and amateur photographers for 75 years. In the past few years we’ve seen the Ritz/Wold camera stores close along with Helix and, now, Calumet. What’s happening to the brick and mortar camera store? Are internet sales killing them off one-by-one? A lot of people are saying yes but we take a different approach.
Different stores have closed for different reasons and maybe, just maybe, a simple explanation is too easy. Camera stores are still viable so what made these two stores take a different and tragically doomed path? How about the lack of internet sales? And to whom does the professional now turn for last minute rentals, repair, and supplies if the brick and mortar camera store is no longer viable? Or are they still viable?
Oh, and we get pretty sidetracked at the beginning and we apologize to, well, pretty much everyone. Except the French – Rick didn’t go off about them today.
But be forewarned – in today’s episode we swear, we drink, and we discuss… umm… ‘habits’.
Art. It’s a word that most of us like to use when describing our photography. How many of you refer to yourselves as ‘art photographers’? Rob and Tony do as do countless others. Som with the word “art” in mind, here’s a question for you: if, for whatever reason, you were no longer able to photograph, what type of art would you pursue?
On today’s show, I don’t think you’ll find many surprises. Tony delves into the world food and stuffing his meat (you gotta listen to understand) specifically. Things get pretty funny and creepy at this point. Rob talks about following his heart and love of the minimal aesthetic in art as it applies to Ikebana and Origami. Rick… yeah, we’re not giving everything away in the show notes, so you have to listen for Rick’s answer.
Now it’s all about sous-vide and chicken custard. Eww.
A Legacy of Images
Legacy? We have a legacy?
In tonight’s show, we get off to a weird and dark start (lots of swearing, WARNING) with the introduction and pwncasting (that’s where we sucker some unsuspecting person who innocently logged into Skype into joining us) of “The Nuge”! Thanks man, that was fun. BTW, the rest of the pre-show banter was recorded and is at the end of the show.
After that we settle into our normal routine and Tony asks us about what we think our legacy will be and, perhaps, what it already is. How about you? What do you see your photographic legacy being? Do you even think you’ll have one? Let us know in the comments below what your thoughts are. We’d love to have the conversation!
So, we’re also dropping the “featured artist and photographer” segment. It’s run its course and we found ourselves struggling to choose one each episode, so it’s kind of hard to say you find someone’s work “inspirational” when you only learned about them 20 minutes earlier. We hope you don’t mind.
Finally, we’re looking for input. We’re coming up on our three year anniversary (can you believe it) and the format needs to evolve more than just change. We’re thinking of adding more chatter about our hobbies and what we’re doing in the rest of our lives in addition. Don’t worry, we’ll still have a main topic for each show but the three of us aren’t feeling like we’re properly engaging you. We’re open to new thoughts and ideas so please give us some feedback of the kinds of shows you have liked, the types of episodes you don’t, and anything else you think would add to the show’s experience.
As always, thanks for listening and being a part of our world.
Rob, Rick, and Tony.
P.S. – Dear Nuge, never bring up the French!
What inspires you, I mean besides photography?
Rounding out the who “seven questions” series we did, Tony thought we should tell more about ourselves and what inspires us. But, this time, talk about the non-photography related things that inspire our photography. Specifically, he wanted us to reveal one hobby, one book and one other thing (yeah, it is annoyingly vague). So we did.
From cooking and brewing (of course) to graphic novels and a children’s book, we’re a pretty eclectic mix of guys. I think that’s why it works so well. As Rob points out, everything we have done, everything we have experienced, everything we have learned to any given point in life can be seen in the art. So don’t think being passionate about golfing doesn’t inspire your creativity!
And, for fuck’s sake – show some passion, will you?
Only had one artist today – the Knoll brothers. Back in 1987, these guys created Photoshop. So, love the state of digital photography today or hate it, these two guys have played a role in how you look at a photography.
What do you think? What inspires you? What else do you do?
This is just a quick announcement – this Sunday (February 9th) the hybrid hero team over at HybridPHOTO.pro and I are launching a new series called Hybrid 101 with Robby D (that’s me). You’ve heard me talk a lot on the show about hybrid photography and this new series is to introduce all photographers, regardless of previous skill or experience, to the photographic realm of hybrid photography.
This Sunday we’re actually holding two seminars. The first is Transitioning to Hybrid and the second one is Continuous Lighting: Hybrid Photography With a Single Light.
Join us in person and pay $29 for both seminars (going forward, they’ll be $29 each) which includes hands-on practice afterward and the Q&A sessions at Hausertown Studio:
319 North Western Avenue
Chicago, IL 60612-2201
Or watch the free stream at HybridLIVE. pro
This show is pretty late in coming out and I (Rob) have a perfectly good reason – I kinda forgot to put it out.
Anyway, great show tonight with a discussion on whether or not it’s still relevant to ask the question, “did they use Photoshop?” I had a conversation on twitter with a group of photographers on Twitter and it started off with a conversation about images that are staged or posed and, of course, it moved on to post-production. Then one of the other guys tosses this out, “Its deciding where photography ends and Photoshop wizadry starts.”
To which I asked, ” is that question still relevant?”
Think about when you listen to music – do you care which microphone or production software was used in making the final recording? Do you care about the process that the production engineer used? Of course not. When you look at a sculpture, do you care which chisels and hammers the artist used? Other than a curiosity in how something was achieved, of course we don’t care. We focus on the final piece.
So why is it that photographers have such a stick up their (okay, our) asses about the process by which a piece of art/photography is created? Did they use Photoshop? And don’t say that we don’t – we really do!
What do you think – if we are trying to produce art and are thinking/visualizing the final image when we capture it and/or manipulate it with software afterward, does it matter?
No, it doesn’t. So maybe it’s time that we collectively pull our heads out of our butts and just appreciate good imagery for the art that it is.
And, as always, let us know what you think in the comments below!
Easton Chang – an Australian photographer who shoots cars and has done some amazing Formula 1 stuff. Care to guess who chose him?
Grant Achatz – A Chicago chef recently in the news for his ranting about children (babies) being in his restaurant. Regardless of your thoughts on this controversy, he’s a culinary visionary. Watch his YouTube video:
It’s the last rapid-question episode and, finally, it’s Tony’s turn to ask Rick and Rob. And, wow, look what happens when you actually spend time thinking about the questions. Well played, Tony, well played.
We run a bit longer on this episode but we’ll be back under an hour next time. But we really wanted to give today’s questions and answers the respect and thought that they deserve.
Here are the questions:
- Which one photography from history do you wish you had taken?
- Which event, since the invention of the camera, would you have loved to have photographed?
- Which friend or family member has had the biggest impact on your photography?
- Who is your favorite artist of all time – from any field other than photography?
- What is your most important personality trait when it comes to being a photographer?
- What is the one topic that will send you into a rage when it comes to photography?
- What have you gotten out of doing the podcast?
Bonus question from Rob today: to date, what’s been your favorite episode so far?
So, from wanton mediocrity that sets Rob off, from choral music to acid rock, and a lot more bizarre stuff, listen to the final set of “what makes the guys tick?”
Jessica Harrison proposes a multi-directional and pervasive model of skin as a space in which body and world mingle. Working with this moving space between artist/maker and viewer, she draws on the active body in both making and interpreting sculpture to unravel imaginative touch and proprioceptive sensation in sculptural practice. In this way, Harrison re-describes the body in sculpture through the skin, offering an alternative way of thinking about the body beyond a binary tradition of inside and outside. (from her web site)
Pete Eckert is a photographer who, originally, was a carpenter until he lost his sight due to Retinitis Pigmentosa. Once blind, he turned to drawing and then photography. His is an amazing story and definitely worth reading. His works have been featured in Playboy Magazine as well as numerous galleries.